Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Mmmmm, socks ...


Every so often it happens. I write a post that causes someone pain, and I find myself learning a lesson I thought I’d learned already. Apparently I have more learning to do. All I can say for myself this time is that at least I swung into immediate action, apologized profusely to the hurt party while simultaneously pulling down the offending post (which one can do nowadays thanks to the IntermaWeb), after which I allowed myself a few hours of sitting in a shame spiral.


Anais Nin once wrote:

I write as I breathe, naturally, flowingly, spontaneously, out of an overflow, not as a substitute for life. I am more interested in lovemaking than in writing, more interested in living than in writing. More interested in becoming a work of art than in creating one. I am more interesting than what I write.


If her biopic -- Henry and June -- is any indication, Nin definitely lived an interesting life. Although I think my life could be called interesting, too, I am not personally interested in becoming a work of art, whatever that means. But it’s the line about being more interested in living than writing that resonates with me. Yup. Real life trumps writing every time. Which means that the people I love trump the characters I create every time, which means I will never (consciously) sacrifice my flesh-and-blood peeps to the writing gods.

Thank the gods the long weekend wasn’t all about my stupid mistakes. It started off with a great visit from a dear friend who came from out of town and met me outside Manic Coffee wearing the most amazing pair of socks.


My first thought was, Manic will not do. Her socks required a more specific backdrop. So I took them (and her) to Ideal Coffee in Kensington market, where we sipped molten soy lattes (at my behest) on Ideal’s patio. And it was.

As we settled into a conversation about her PhD anxieties (which I’ll get to in a minute), a self-assured pug rooting around at my feet and making pig noises decided to hop on my lap and make himself at home. Between the eye-popping socks and the perfectest pug, I wondered how things could possibly get better.


As the three of us enjoyed the sunshine, while two of us got high on caffeine and one of us fell in love, I put on my listening face as my friend recounted her dissertation struggles: how she wants to approach her thesis like an art project, but how she is afraid to express her authentic voice in an academic context. I won’t go into detail because this story is best read on the faces of anyone who has ever attempted a PhD. It’s a tale of horror so scary no one has enough hands to cover their eyes and ears. I’ve often thought academia should get out of the business of enlightenment and into the business of torture instead. Water boarding has nothing on the unique self-esteem-eroding methods of the academy.


The long and short of it is that she was feeling overwhelmed by her inner critic, but all I could really focus on were her mindblowing socks. She is always wearing fabulous socks. When she was done talking, I waited a beat, took a deep breath so as to formulate a thoughtful response, and finally managed to ask what I think a trenchant and, frankly, super pertinent question: “Where did you get those socks????”

She told me she got them in Ottawa. They were hand made by a certain designer, etc. And then she told me that she was wearing them inside out because she likes the way the seams look. Fascinating. So here’s a woman who fears expressing her authentic voice in the context of the academy but who has no qualms taking someone’s one-of-a-kind sock design and flouting the way they are supposed to be worn, making them even more original!!!!!

Why can she do it in one context and not another? In a word: context. Martha Beck, one of my favourite humans I’ve never met, describes this contextual blind spot as something we can’t see when we are inside our own culture. There are many French theorists who say the same thing in high tones and with expensive words, but Martha Beck brings it home with a story about a guy who suffers outrageous guilt when he sneaks into his girlfriend’s tooth filing ceremony (in Bali), a ritual he’s not supposed to see. As cultural outsiders, his guilt might seem ridiculous to us (unless you are Balinese). But try telling your out-of-work friend that going to Berlin in the spring time is far more life affirming than a job hunt when her mother sees it as an act of utter irresponsibility (you're killing me!), and you’ll see a person suffer inside a whole other contextual blind spot in which they actually believe their choices might precipitate their mother's death. Yes, it’s a cliché, but it also happens to be a lived truth, at least at the level of a lived fear.


One of my favourite cartoons shows a couple in bed, each with a smile on their respective faces and their own thought bubble, one thinking, “mmmmm sex …” the other thinking “mmmmmmm socks …” I have no idea how this relates to my friend’s sexy socks and dissertation dilemma, but I have definitely had that experience of lying in bed on a winter’s night thoroughly enjoying the feeling of my warm toes inside my woolen socks. But I digress . . .


The day after her visit, I sent my friend pics I took of her sumptuously socked calves and she sent me an e-mail telling me she had posted the pics on her fridge “as a reminder.”

“A reminder of what?” I wrote back.

“Definintely to wear great socks. Probably to also pick up another pair the next time I am in Ottawa. And also to risk being myself. All three decent ideas.”

More than decent. Blogable!

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Best Funeral Ever


Joni Mitchell was mostly bang on when she asked, don’t it always seem to go that you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone? But I’d like to add a slight refinement to that sentiment – sometimes you can’t actually enjoy what you had until it’s gone and remembered instead.


I can’t speak for others, but I know I live with a kind of fore guilt about a particular family member’s death. I know I will miss that person terribly and will wonder why I didn’t just suck it up while they were alive and spend more time them, despite a lifetime of painful experiences doing just that. But I also know that once gone, joyful memories will eclipse painful ones, which will likely make the mourning that much more excruciating. In other words, that particular death will be a double whammy since I already feel the loss of connection in life, so in death I'll feel loss upon loss.


My beautiful guru tells me that nothing is wasted. I attended a memorial service last weekend that made manifest this idea: experience – painful or sweet – always offers abundance. Last Sunday at the Quaker home in Toronto, Ian’s family and friends gathered to mourn and celebrate his life.


During the last ten years of Ian’s existence (post his marriage break up), he mostly lived inside a profound depression. Ian was also diabetic, so he was at double risk for early death – people with diabetes have to take extra care of themselves to stay healthy. But when you’re depressed, caring for yourself is pretty much the last thing you care about.


Ian was not the easiest person to relate to. My first introduction to him was via a family photo. He was a beautiful boy. I fantasized about becoming his future wife so that I could not only be his sister, Rosemary’s, best friend forever but also her sister-in-law … forEVER! I was 18. As it turns out, I did not get to know Ian in the flesh until almost two decades later when I worked for his best friend, C. It was Ian who got me the job. I remembered this amazing fact last Sunday as I sat in a room in a house belonging to Quakers -- a place I would have never expected to visit in my lifetime, much less attend a memorial.


If you’ve not been to a Quaker funeral service before, let me tell you it’s the only thing that will ever make sense to me from now on. The guests gather in a semi-circle in what the Quakers call a meeting room, which you enter in silence, and where you drop further into meditative, or prayerful silence once seated. The quiet was gently broken when one of the Quaker friends got up to explain the service ritual: everyone sits quietly until those who feel moved to speak do so. That’s it.

In that silence, I thought about how Ian did not know me well when he told C to hire me. He just knew C needed an editor, and he knew Rosemary’s friend, me, was one. But with this chance recommendation, Ian effectively launched my editing career.



Ian’s depression often took the form of talking up grandiose plans while complaining about the various obstacles in his way, never counting his own anger and bitterness among the obstacles. Strangely enough, Ian also had an optimistic streak that allowed him to dream big, beautiful social-justice-y dreams of traveling to underprivileged countries to help children in abject poverty gain computer skills. He did just that with his wife in Nicaragua. But when the marriage ended, so did that work. Unfortunately, his brand of optimism had a belligerence to it, which made him hard to listen to. During the time I worked for C, Ian shared the same office space. I was on the brink of my own depression, so I shut Ian's out. Looking back, I’m sure I unconsciously feared seeing my own fast-approaching nosedive mirrored in Ian’s fully-blossomed depressed state.




My turn occurred a few months after I started working for C. Had C not been Ian’s best friend (and an incredible human being who has become a dear friend of mine), I would likely have lost my job. Instead, C sent me home to where I could work in ten-minute increments between bouts of sobbing. Incredibly, my work minutes somehow added up to a 300-some-page marketing manual for home inspectors that C and I co-wrote. Because of Ian and C’s friendship, C treated me the way he treated Ian: like family. I have Ian to thank for that, no matter how tangentially.


It’s the tangents, it turns out, that end up bringing us the most surprising things in life. About three years ago, Ian joined the Quakers, following in his other sister’s footsteps. Even through the blackness, Ian sought the company of others, which I admire because I do the opposite: withdraw. In the week leading up to Ian’s memorial service, one of the Quakers gently encouraged Rosemary, Ian’s executor, to hold a celebration of Ian’s Life. Rosemary and Ian had not lived in the same city for decades, so her experience of him had largely been one of seeing a man almost totally disconnected from others.


She could not imagine who would come to the service apart from family and two or three friends who had known Ian before his slide down. But the tangential tentacles of Ian’s person had reached into unexpected places Rosemary had not heard about. Until Sunday, that is, at which point she was given the most exquisite gift of being wrong.


The room was filled to capacity. And there was not much silence because everyone had something to say about his or her connection to Ian. Had Rosemary and her family held a traditional service in a church, more than likely presided over by a minister who did not know Ian, they never would have known just how much Ian touched the lives of others.


Here's what happened for me in the service. I’ve known Rosemary for twenty some-odd years, and, through her, I’ve known her childhood friends as well. On Sunday, I saw them all with their own families, their children now having reached the decrepit old ages of 6 through 12. One of the things that generally arises at family-gathering occasions, mine or other people’s, is the bubbling up of my sadness around that missing part of my life. It didn’t help that Rosemary’s father’s second question to me (the first being my name since he remembered my face but not who I was) was if I had a family. His tone was rhetorical, expecting nothing else but a yes. In his mind, how could it be otherwise.


As I sat listening to the stories about Ian, my sadness taking up all the available space left in the room, I realized that as little as I knew, or related to, Ian, we shared the experience of sadness. In this way, I was able to connect to Ian’s pain. He had loved his wife utterly. That loss was one from which he never recovered.


A few weeks ago, my doctor -- a woman so shiny and new I’m convinced she graduated from med school yesterday -- spoke to me as if I were a crone in palliative care. Scrunching up her eyebrows into an upside-down greater sign, she said, “Liz, let’s be honest here, what are the chances, really, at this point in your life, that you will have children?”

When I was able to speak, I said I was not ready to close that door just yet. To her credit, she took my response on board as if solving world hunger with an around-the-world snap. She moved the conversation forward with a tidy, “OK then, tubal ligation is off the table. Next!”

I’ve always been grateful that I did not feel my life would be totally incomplete without kids. I wished them for my friends who wanted them. And I just thought instead that my situation meant I got to read more, travel more, run more, have more alone time, have sex whenever I wanted and wherever I wanted, and whatever else one can do sans kids. Still, as much as my friends envy me my kid-free time, I envy them their families. As much as they pity me my solitude, I pity them their lack thereof. It’s always a mixed bag, this life.



As in life, so in death. What Rosemary and her family heard on Sunday was the sad-sweet symphony of Ian’s life. Turns out Ian was not alone after all, but looked out for by his newfound community, with frequent, regular dinner dates and phone-call check ins. Many people had his back and held his heart in theirs. These people spoke of how much Ian meant to them, how much he contributed to their lives, and how much he would be missed. Talk about clean mourning.


My beautiful guru has often spoken to me about the difference between clean and dirty pain. The latter is pain you generate (and experience) when you tip toe around something because you fear causing pain, but what you usually end up doing is acting in dishonest and furtive ways, causing greater pain because the person you think you are protecting picks up on your dissembling vibe. Clean pain is the pain of telling the truth, even if it hurts. It shows respect for both another person and for sadness itself, which is not to be avoided like swine flu. It is part of our human experience and deserves space to breathe, not to mention our respect.


Recently, I have been feeling a little uncomfortable about my rah-rah, grab-life-by the-balls attitude with which I try to pull “stuck” friends out of their holes and into the sunlight where I believe they will shine. Ian’s memorial service illuminated a far more nuanced understanding of life and death that I often miss in my bull-in-a-china-shop approach to life (and death). There is not one way to live or die. Perhaps “stalled” is where some people are more comfortable, and, therefore, happy. Who am I to try to modify their experience? After all, even I embrace my own sadness when I’m there, rabidly resisting attempts from others to make me feel better.


When my physically hulking grandfather was reduced to a deflated form under a thin hospital sheet, so short of breath he was no longer able to even throw his weight around verbally, my uncle, his son, had a heart-to-heart with me in the hospital hallway re: his sister, my mother. He’d just seen me do something I’ve been doing my whole life: trying to derail my mother's constant train of dissatisfaction. As usual, my attempt to lift her blackness ended in a bicker session, and, as always, in an utterly inappropriate setting, such as beside my grandfather’s deathbed. So, in the hallway, my uncle said to me, “Liz, what makes you think your mother is unhappy?” It was the wake-up-you-idiot! slap Rhett Butler delivers to Scarlett O’Hara. “If your mother didn’t get something out of her pain, she’d make it stop.”


Even writing this down feels like a betrayal. Not just to her but to Ian and to all the people I know who suffer from depression and anxiety. Having been in that chemical soup myself, I know it’s not easy to stop the pain. I struggled with depression on and off for five years. But that time was not wasted. It was my life’s experience. I learned in that time that life happens on a full spectrum of emotions. I also learned that depression did not define me. It was just how I felt and what I did at that time. I am in a different place now. And I will be in a different place again later on.

Ian was no more a diabetic than he was a depressive. He was a man who struggled with both, but neither was a defining feature, even when they seemed to overwhelm his experience of himself, and everyone else’s experience of him.

As in death, so in life. I doubt very much Ian will be remembered as a diabetic or a depressive alone, and perhaps not much at all. Ian is like the elephant that twenty blind men and women try to describe from the laying of hands in twenty different places. All of their descriptions are true for that particular part of the elephant.



But no part captures of the complex nature of the whole. Collectively, however, they add up to the lovable, difficult and everything-in-between human being that Ian still is in our minds and hearts.

To be honest, I cannot say I would have gone out of my way to spend time with Ian in life, painful though that is to write. But I can just as honestly say I’m sorry he’s gone, and sad that he did not find love again, or return to South America to do the work he was born to do. But the children whose lives he did touch when there with his wife, kids who have no idea Ian no longer walks this earth, still no doubt experience his love as tangibly as if he were alive.


And I wonder, is there really a difference between life and death when it comes to how much we love someone and how loved we feel by them?